Overview of NIRF
• MHRD (Ministry of Human Resource Development) has released Ranking System Framework for Higher Educational Institutions of India. This is the first time that a reliable, transparent and authentic ranking system is being implemented in the country for Higher Education.
Objective
• To bring fair competition among Indian universities.
• Now parents and students will have worth information about the quality of a particular university, college or vocational institution.
In what background was NIRF developed?
In the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THEWUR) 2014
Not a single Indian university could make it to the list of top 275 universities in the world and
Not a single institute of engineering & technology figured in the top 100 institutes in the category.
Then some educationists argued that that India should have its own system of ranking educational institutions based on certain India-specific parameters.
In this background NIRF was launched in 2015 by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD).
What are the Parameters?
• The parameters broadly cover:
PARAMETERS
|
COMPONENTS |
Teaching, Learning & Resources | · Student Strength including Doctoral Students
· Faculty-student ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty · Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience · Total Budget and Its Utilisation |
Research & Professional Practices | · Combined metric for Publications
· Combined metric for Quality of Publications · IPR and Patents: Filed, Published, Granted and Licensed · Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice And Executive Development Programs |
Graduation Outcomes | · Combined % for Placement, Higher Studies, and Entrepreneurship (GPHE)
· Metric for University Examinations: GUE · Median Salary · Metric for Graduating Students Admitted Into Top Universities (GTOP) · Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated GPHD |
Outreach and Inclusivity | · Percent Students from other states/countries (Region Diversity RD)
· Percentage of Women (Women students + faculty) · Economically and Socially Challenged Students · Facilities for Physically Challenged Students |
Perception | · Peer Perception: Employers and Research Investors
· Peer Perception: Academics · Public Perception · Competitiveness |
What can be further done to further improve NIRF?
Suggestions on some parameters to improve quality of higher education system
Parameter | Observation & suggestion |
Teaching, learning and resources
|
· In many private educational institutions, quality of teachers is not up to the mark as they are not paid on par with their counterparts working in government or government-aided institutions.
· Thus pay to faculties should be increased.
|
Research and professional practices
|
· It is not the quantity but the quality, originality, relevance and usefulness of research papers that matter.
· Of late the research papers have been characterised by manufacturing of data, plagiarism and academic dishonesty. · Thus a check should be there on this.
|
Outreach and inclusivity (OI)
|
· Working in our local areas is much more than charity for higher education institutions.
· Just like Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Institute Social Responsibility (ISR) should be emphasised. · Each educational institution should adopt a few villages where the faculty and students should interact with the villagers and impart their knowledge to the rural people and learn local lessons from them. |
India rankings